Hi there! Welcome to the new look Pendal website... Take a two minute tour to see what we’ve changed.
Login

Mainstream Online Web Portal

Investors can view their accounts online via a secure web portal. After registering, you can access your account balances, periodical statements, tax statements, transaction histories and distribution statements / details.
Advisers will also have access to view their clients’ accounts online via the secure web portal.

Beyond divestment: why owning companies we don’t like can be a good thing

Investors who want to make a difference in the world have far more potent weapons at their disposal than merely selling their shares.

  • Screening strategies not enough to drive change
  • Investors need a new approach – hold and vote
  • Exxon Mobil defeat a clarion call for shareholder power

THIS YEAR’s stunning defeat of Exxon Mobil by Engine No.1, a tiny activist fund that resulted in three new directors on the board of one of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies, is the most public example of the rise of a new type of shareholder engagement.

It is expected to accelerate a dawning realisation among investors that when it comes to public equity markets, there are stronger avenues for change than traditional methods of screening and divesting companies.

If every climate-minded investor sold their coal shares, that would leave control of those companies in the hands of the least climate-minded owners.

Susheela Peres da Costa

“But while there are good reasons for an investor to not want to be exposed to fossil fuel assets, it’s another thing altogether to assume a company cares who owns its shares.

“It’s worse than having no impact because it makes for a false sense of security.

“Even if every climate-minded investor sold their coal shares, that would leave control of those companies in the hands of the least climate-minded owners.”

Regnan's head of advisory, Susheela Peres da Costa
Regnan’s head of advisory, Susheela Peres da Costa


Regnan’s work suggests investors who want to make a difference in the world have far more potent weapons at their disposal than merely selling their shares.

Stewardship initiatives, in which institutions use their investor influence for change, are proving to be a powerful lever.
Investor stewardship can also be successful putting resolutions to boards and reigning in unhelpful corporate influence on government policy.

Advocacy is an area where coalitions of smaller investors can have a real effect, directly asking regulators, industry bodies and governments for change.

And investing in disruption to drive change is also an effective strategy.

But what about small investors without access to these avenues?

“Figure out where your power really is,” says Peres da Costa. “Unless you are an enormous institution, big enough to move market prices, you have much more power as a consumer – what products and services you buy, who from, and whether you are vocal about why.

“So, you say ‘I don’t want my shares ever to be voted in favour of a director who is trying to entrench fossil fuels in the economy’. And you check which financial service providers commit to that before you entrust them with your money.

Find out about

Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund

Peres da Costa points out that this simplifies many of the challenges associated with trying to invest responsibly, by focussing the discussion on what kind of impact investors want to have.

“It’s too easy to get caught up in details when you focus on divestment, or ‘screening’,” Peres da Costa says.

“For instance, should divestment focus on companies that produce fossil fuels? Or firms that burn them, releasing global warming gases into the atmosphere? Are firms that support the fossil fuel supply chain in or out? Coal ports? Gas pipelines? Roadside retailers of petrol?

“Burning fossil fuels is a major part of industries as diverse as energy generation, steelmaking and aviation. Many of the largest organisations involved in fossil fuels are governments; are we divesting airlines and countries too?

“Are all carbon emissions equal? Is coal burnt to make steel for wind turbines worse than lower-carbon oil to air-freight fresh tropical fruit to temperate markets?

“These are often interesting debate topics, but dodge the deeper question most clients are interested in addressing: What does my money do?”

Read more about what investors can do to drive change at The Divestment Dilemma.

About Susheela Peres da Costa

Susheela is Regnan’s head of advisory. She has more than 15 years of domestic and international experience advising institutional investors on responsible investment.

As Head of Advisory, she has assisted small foundations through to the world’s largest institutions, including a successful 18-month project in Switzerland responsible investment leadership for a global full-service bank and strategic advice to the UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment on upgrading stewardship.

Susheela chairs the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia and is special adviser to the co-chair of the Australian Sustainable Finance Initiative.

About Regnan

Regnan is a responsible investment leader with a long and proud history of providing insight and advice to investors with an interest in long-term, broad-based or values-aligned performance.

Building on that expertise, in 2019 Regnan expanded into responsible investment funds management, backed by the considerable resources of Pendal Group.

Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund invests in mission-driven companies we believe are well placed to solve the world’s biggest problems, while the Regnan Credit Impact Trust (available in Australia only) invests in cash, fixed and floating rate securities where the proceeds create positive environmental and social change.

Visit Regnan.com

Find out about Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund

Find out about Regnan Credit Impact Trust

For more information on these and other responsible investing strategies, contact Head of Regnan and Responsible Investment Distribution Jeremy Dean at jeremy.dean@regnan.com.

Find out about

Regnan Global Equity Impact Solutions Fund


This article has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and the information contained within is current as at July 21, 2021. It is not to be published, or otherwise made available to any person other than the party to whom it is provided.

This article is for general information purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation.

The information in this article may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information in this article is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Performance figures are calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Council (FSC) standards. Performance data (post-fee) assumes reinvestment of distributions and is calculated using exit prices, net of management costs. Performance data (pre-fee) is calculated by adding back management costs to the post-fee performance. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Any projections contained in this article are predictive and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. While we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections.

Keep updated
Sign up to receive the latest news and views