Ramaphosa no sure cure for South Africa
“Ramaphosa inherits stagnant economy and divided party”
Financial Times, 15 February 2018
One of the unfortunate facts of emerging market investing is that emerging market political leaders who come to power with promises of much-needed reforms tend to disappoint. Even in the last few years, leaders from Jokowi in Indonesia to Enrique Peña Nieto in Mexico have started their leaderships with significant progress but subsequently disappointed (“Jokowi’s 35,000MW electricity program only reaches 3.8% progress” – Jakarta Post, 4 March 2018; “Release of jailed union boss reveals Mexican president’s empty promise” – Guardian, 21 December 2017).
The latest new national leader to promise a break with the past is South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa, elected the country’s president in February following the resignation of Jacob Zuma after a raft of corruption allegations. From the December 2017 confirmation that Cyril Ramaphosa would replace Jacob Zuma to the February 2018 transition of power, the South African rand rallied 14.0% against the US dollar, reflecting optimism for political and economic reforms under a Ramaphosa administration. In particular, his decision to recall previous ministers Nhlanhla Nene and Pravin Gordhan (both sacked by Zuma) suggests improved prospects for economic policy and governance.
However, it is our view that South Africa faces serious economic challenges with no obvious solutions, while the broad political grouping that is the ANC will further constrain the new Government’s ability to act.
We regard all incoming EM political reformers as ‘show-me’ stories, but this is particularly true of Cyril Ramaphosa, as we cannot even see the reform path that would turn South Africa around.
The most serious problem for South Africa is its failure to generate economic growth. The National Development Plan requires a 5.4% economic growth rate to make a serious dent in the country’s 27% unemployment rate. Growth in the last five years has averaged 1.4%, and consensus expectations are for 1.5% in 2018 and 1.7% in 2019. There are various reasons for the poor growth rate, but South Africa’s failures in the last 20 years to support both infrastructure and education are particularly to blame. While the recent water supply shortage in Cape Town has attracted the most news coverage, a chronic undersupply of electrical power has had far worse effects on business and the economy. To address either the infrastructure or education problems will take large sums of state investment as well as considerable time, which make improvements seem simply impossible.
The South African fiscal budget remains materially stretched. The fiscal deficit is estimated to have been 4.3% of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2017, Fitch and S&P cut South Africa’s sovereign credit rating to junk last year, and Moody’s put the country on review for a credit downgrade in November 2017 (which is expected to be confirmed later this month). Meanwhile, parastatals like electricity power utility, Eskom, face financial distress. Eskom has recently sought ZAR20 billion (AUD$2.15 billion) in emergency credit from the Government just to remain operational. The higher education sector needs an additional ZAR 12 billion (AUD$ 1.3 billion) in financing this year.
In addition, the good news of the appointments of Nene and Gordhan is balanced by the problematic appointment of David Mabuza as Deputy President. Being an old ANC party insider from the struggle against apartheid, Mabuza has been the subject of very serious allegations in the last few years, including links to corruption and violence. The Ramaphosa administration is emphatically not a clean break from the Zuma years.
We regard all incoming EM political reformers as ‘show-me’ stories, but this is particularly true of Cyril Ramaphosa, as we cannot even see the reform path that would turn South Africa around. We remain cautious on the South African economy and currency, and prefer to invest in South African companies doing most of their business in other emerging markets.
This article has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and the information contained within is current as at March 12, 2018. It is not to be published, or otherwise made available to any person other than the party to whom it is provided.
PFSL is the responsible entity and issuer of units in the Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (Fund) ARSN: 159 605 811. A product disclosure statement (PDS) is available for the Fund and can be obtained by calling 1800 813 886 or visiting www.pendalgroup.com. You should obtain and consider the PDS before deciding whether to acquire, continue to hold or dispose of units in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment of withdrawal proceeds and loss of income and principal invested.
This article is for general information purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation.
The information in this article may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information in this article is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information.
Any projections contained in this article are predictive and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. While we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections.