James Syme

Senior Fund Manager, JOHCM

Leadership matters in emerging markets

 

“Mexico leftist Amlo vows no nationalisation, no expropriations”

Financial Times headline, 9 March 2018

 

One of the challenges in analysing the effect of political change on capital markets within emerging markets is the short history of the asset class. With 30 years of data at most, a country with a four-year electoral cycle will only have seven or eight electoral data points to consider and these must also be taken in the context of economic and market drivers at both the national and global levels.

And this matters in 2018 with a fully-loaded electoral calendar (notwithstanding the unscheduled transitions in power we have seen this year in Peru and South Africa). In particular, the two large Latin American markets, Brazil and Mexico, go to the polls in October and July, respectively, while Colombia also votes on its next president this month.

 

Brazil’s political disconnect

Since emerging market equity came to the fore as an asset class in the late 1990s, Brazil has seen seven presidential elections. The return from Brazilian equities in those calendar years (as measured by the MSCI Brazil Index in US dollar terms) has varied widely, from +63.8% in 1994 to -44.1% in 1998. Overall, the average US dollar return in an election year in Brazil is +8.7%, compared with an average of +9.4% in those same years for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, suggesting a limited impact.

Where the Brazilian electoral experience gets more interesting is if we separate out the elections that returned generally centrist/conservative presidencies (1989, 1994 and 1998) from those that returned more left-wing/populist governments (2002, 2006, 2010 and 2014). The first set saw an average market return of +17.9% compared with +7.7% for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index in those same years, while the second set saw an average return of +1.8% compared with +10.7% for the same index. It seems the focus needs to be on the election result rather than the simple fact of an election. This is further supported by the sharply negative short-term market performance around the 2002 and 2014 elections, which were finely balanced but ultimately decided in favour of the left-wing candidate.

 

And south of the border….

A potentially similar pattern is also seen in the Mexican presidential elections (although these are held every six years, so there are even fewer data points). Mexico has elected presidents in 1988, 1994, 2000, 2006 and 2012. Despite a wide range of results (including the disastrous year of 1994 which saw a leading candidate assassinated in March and a sovereign debt default in December), the overall pattern is that the average market return in these years has been +15.2%, compared with +9.1% for the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Significantly, in none of those five elections has the most left-wing candidate been victorious, suggesting a similar market dynamic to that seen in Brazil.

So what is the prognosis for 2018? The Mexican election is likely to be won by a populist left-wing candidate, Andrés Manuel López Obrador (normally known as Amlo). This implies significant risk to Mexican equities heading into the election, and despite other attractive features of the market, we retain our neutral position because of political risk. Although, we would note that as per the quote above, Amlo has sounded far more centrist in recent weeks, and significant weakness in Mexican assets around the election may offer an exciting buying opportunity, as was seen in Brazil in 2002 when Lula was first elected.

The Brazilian election is complicated. With Lula (the left-wing Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT) party’s preferred candidate) potentially facing jail for corruption, the leading candidate is abrasive far-right politician, Jair Bolsanaro. If he is to be Brazil’s next president, the better comparison may be the present-day Philippines under President Rodrigo Duterte. Since President Duterte assumed office in June 2016, the MSCI Philippines Index has returned -10.6% (in US dollar terms), compared with a return of +46.5% from the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. We consequently remain underweight Brazilian equities.

This article has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and the information contained within is current as at May 4, 2018. It is not to be published, or otherwise made available to any person other than the party to whom it is provided.

PFSL is the responsible entity and issuer of units in the Pendal Global Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (Fund) ARSN: 159 605 811. A product disclosure statement (PDS) is available for the Fund and can be obtained by calling 1800 813 886 or visiting www.pendalgroup.com. You should obtain and consider the PDS before deciding whether to acquire, continue to hold or dispose of units in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment of withdrawal proceeds and loss of income and principal invested.

This article is for general information purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation.

The information in this article may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date. While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information in this article is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information.

Any projections contained in this article are predictive and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. While we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections.

Related Articles