Hi there! Welcome to the new look Pendal website... Take a two minute tour to see what we’ve changed.

Mainstream Online Web Portal

Investors can view their accounts online via a secure web portal. After registering, you can access your account balances, periodical statements, tax statements, transaction histories and distribution statements / details.
Advisers will also have access to view their clients’ accounts online via the secure web portal.

Crispin Murray: What’s driving Aussie equities this week

Here are the main factors driving the ASX this week according to our head of equities CRISPIN MURRAY. Reported by portfolio specialist Chris Adams

A COMBINATION of northern hemisphere summer doldrums and limited data is keeping news-flow reasonably quiet.

US and Australian bond yields are both re-testing cycle highs, capturing a lot of attention.

Rising bond yields and a stronger US dollar saw equities fall last week, continuing their consolidation from the end of July. The S&P 500 fell 2.05% and the S&P/ASX 300 lost 2.34%.

The market is also focused on weakness in China’s economy.

Along with talk of inventory reductions, this encouraged a continued sell-off in the lithium complex. Though iron ore miners maintained their remarkable resilience.

Softer Australian employment data helped drive our dollar lower versus the USD.

In local ASX results, season operational performance has largely been solid. But there have been concerns about debt costs for the more leveraged companies.


The Chinese economy remains under intense scrutiny.

This was maintained last week by concern of the imminent default of property developer Country Garden, missed payments from investment company Zhongrong Trust and a continuation of weak economic data.

The challenges are symbolised by Beijing’s decision to stop publishing data on youth unemployment — which stands at about 21 per cent.

Data on land sale volumes and consumer confidence are also suspended in the name of maintaining confidence.

Confidence is the key issue:

  • High youth unemployment deters consumer spending
  • Fears about the solvency of private developers discourage new home purchases, due to the risk that dwellings may not be completed
  • Investment trust defaults such as Zhongrong’s may trigger redemption requests, leading to a liquidity squeeze

This lack of confidence can be seen in a lack of private investment, which is down 7 per cent in the first seven months of 2023, versus state-owned-enterprise investment up 12 per cent. 

Concern over property lies at the heart of the confidence problem. New housing starts are down more than 60 per cent from the 2019 peak.

There was a widely-held expectation that the market would stabilise following such a dramatic decline.

But July data indicates the weakness continues.

Goldman Sachs cut its forecast for 2023 new housing starts from -10% to -20% on the previous year and expects the property sector to detract 1.5% from GDP growth.

Beijing’s 2023 GDP target of 5% was initially seen as something of a low-ball target which could be exceeded.

Now the market is cutting GDP forecasts to sub-5% as we see recent trends in retail sales, auto sales and other indicators start to slow.

There have been a number of policy initiatives, including some interest rate easing and bringing forward some spending by local governments.

But these measures have been incremental and unable to reverse deteriorating sentiment.

While this is a bearish portrait, some China-related stocks and sectors on the ASX have held up — notably the miners.

The bulls are taking the view that things are so bad, they’re good — which would increase the chance of a more convincing policy response such as the one we saw in 2015.

They are drawing a comparison with the period prior to the reversal of the Zero-covid policy, where there were incremental signals before the major policy change.

There’s also a theory that Beijing is biding its time, reasoning there would be no point launching an initiative in high summer as it wouldn’t get traction. Beijing may be waiting until September, the theory goes.

If a major policy response doesn’t materialise, we see some risk around bulk commodity producers at these levels.

US macro outlook

US GDP surprised to the upside with 5.8% growth in the second quarter.

The market is trying to understand how this can happen.

Some relates to higher investment.

It’s too early for the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to be felt, but the 2022 CHIPs and Science Act (CHIPS stands for Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors) of 2022 is having some effect.

Consumption, however, is the main driver.

One observation is that business tax refunds have surged since March, adding an additional $100 billion in potential spending power.

A lot of this relates to small business and is tied to the Covid-era policy of employment-retention tax credits.

This policy, which remains in place until 2025, is seeing business tax refunds run at four times pre-pandemic levels.

The policy’s original costing was US$85 billion over 10 years. It has cost US$150 billion in the past 12 months alone. 

This is a good example of how some stimulative fiscal settings have become entrenched and are helping the economy outperform expectations.

The stronger economic outlook can also be seen in the Atlanta Fed’s GDP NOW measure, which is indicating an almost 6% growth in GDP for the third quarter.

We suspect this is overstated. But it still retains a healthy buffer over the 1& to 2.5% range of forecasts from consensus.

The New York and Philadelphia Fed regional manufacturing surveys appear to be bottoming, reinforcing the soft-landing case.

They are also signalling a pick-up in prices received, which may give the Fed some pause for thought.

This more resilient economy means markets are expecting interest rates to stay higher for longer, and reinforce the view that real rates need to stay higher for this cycle.

Combined with structural pressure on the government budget deficit from funding costs and more legislated spending — plus extra supply and lower offshore demand for treasuries — this helps explain the increase in bond yields. 

It also suggests that while the market is bearish on bonds — allowing potential for a near-term reprieve — we should not expect a sustained reversal in yields. 


Australian equities were down last week, in line with the US.

Only REITs (+1.27%) held up, largely due to the influence of Goodman Group.

Lithium names were weak on a macro trade against them.

Domestic high-yield names were also soft, partly due to the realisation that bond yields were staying higher.


About Crispin Murray and Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund

Crispin Murray is Pendal’s Head of Equities. He has more than 27 years of investment experience and leads one of the largest equities teams in Australia. Crispin’s Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund has beaten the benchmark in 12 years of its 16-year history (after fees), across a range of market conditions.

Pendal is a global investment management business focused on delivering superior investment returns for our clients through active management. 

Find out more about Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund  

Contact a Pendal key account manager

This information has been prepared by Pendal Fund Services Limited (PFSL) ABN 13 161 249 332, AFSL No 431426 and is current at August 21, 2023. PFSL is the responsible entity and issuer of units in the Pendal Focus Australian Share Fund (Fund) ARSN: 113 232 812. A product disclosure statement (PDS) is available for the Fund and can be obtained by calling 1300 346 821 or visiting www.pendalgroup.com.

The Target Market Determination (TMD) for the Fund is available at www.pendalgroup.com/ddo. You should obtain and consider the PDS and the TMD before deciding whether to acquire, continue to hold or dispose of units in the Fund. An investment in the Fund or any of the funds referred to in this web page is subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment of withdrawal proceeds and loss of income and principal invested. This information is for general purposes only, should not be considered as a comprehensive statement on any matter and should not be relied upon as such. It has been prepared without taking into account any recipient’s personal objectives, financial situation or needs. Because of this, recipients should, before acting on this information, consider its appropriateness having regard to their individual objectives, financial situation and needs. This information is not to be regarded as a securities recommendation. The information may contain material provided by third parties, is given in good faith and has been derived from sources believed to be accurate as at its issue date.

While such material is published with necessary permission, and while all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information is complete and correct, to the maximum extent permitted by law neither PFSL nor any company in the Pendal group accepts any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of this information. Performance figures are calculated in accordance with the Financial Services Council (FSC) standards. Performance data (post-fee) assumes reinvestment of distributions and is calculated using exit prices, net of management costs. Performance data (pre-fee) is calculated by adding back management costs to the post-fee performance.

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any projections are predictive only and should not be relied upon when making an investment decision or recommendation. Whilst we have used every effort to ensure that the assumptions on which the projections are based are reasonable, the projections may be based on incorrect assumptions or may not take into account known or unknown risks and uncertainties. The actual results may differ materially from these projections. For more information, please call Customer Relations on 1300 346 821 8am to 6pm (Sydney time) or visit our website www.pendalgroup.com

Keep updated
Sign up to receive the latest news and views